Messenger When India gained independence from Britain on August 15the majority of Anglo-Indians had either left or would leave soon after. Many within the Indian Civil Service would write of the trauma that they experienced from witnessing the violence of the years leading up to the end of British rule and the bloodbath that would follow as the lines of partition were revealed. Colonialism was certainly a far more traumatising experience for colonial subjects than their colonisers.
The economic base was primarily agricultural, the tools and implements did not register any remarkable change through time, and arts and crafts mostly connected with poorly developed production grew. Socially the framework consisted of comparatively self-sufficient village communities in groups of contiguous villages.
Caste was the typical Indian institution to accommodate various socio-economic strata and nascent classes, binding them together in groups and ensuring such constituents an occupational protection as well. The British rule introduced the railways, the press, and the western system of education, clubs and associations all of which shook the prevalent socio-economic order.
But the processes of exploitation unleashed by them destroyed the possibilities of development of industries and a modern economic system in India. The British rule rather systematically destroyed the native industries of India for the benefit of the industries in Britain and their market in India.
Even though it sought to tie down the people it ruled to colonial backwardness, it released new historical forces within the Indian fold by throwing the traditional economic system and socio-cultural order out of gear. It gave birth to the desire of material advancement and better amenities and living conditions of individuals.
Also it gave birth to a spirit of inquiry in the minds of Indian intellectuals who came in contact with western education.
Both the social reformists and the conservatives took a fresh and critical look at their own society and culture as a reaction to western interpretation of the same.Colonial India was the part of the Indian subcontinent which was under the jurisdiction of European colonial powers, during the Age of Discovery.
European power was exerted both by conquest and trade, especially in spices.
When India gained independence from Britain on August 15 , the majority of Anglo-Indians had either left or would leave soon after. Many within the Indian Civil Service would write of the.
European Colonization in India Why did the British colonize India and how did it effect the people already living there?
What is India like prior to the arrival of the Europeans?! India was large territory with a giant and growing British Colonialism in srmvision.com srmvision.com in New Cambridge History of India in , said that "Colonialism in India was a result of an uneasy collaboration between British and Indian Merchants, Bankers and New Gentry".
Now since this was the general view, one needs to know what exactly was the nature of . The British had a clear goal: to westernize and Christianize India, using all possible means.
Define your site secondary menu. Commentary; Indology; Advocacy. British Colonization of India. The British had a clear goal: to westernize and Christianize India, using all possible means.
British Colonialism in India Colonialism is a distinct form of imperialism in which a colonizing nation exerts direct controls over a colonized state by military, economic, and political means. The forceful widespread intrusion of a colonizing nation naturally causes an irreversible.